The educated often feel a sense of loyalty, kinship and duty to the system that they feel has created them.
This demographic ‘patriotism’ overides their critical thought whenever the motherland-establishment declares that it should, in a phenomenon that amounts to the formation of compulsively reason-blind obedience-holes in professional class members’ perception and analysis.
These holes appear wherever an official lie matters enough to its establishment authors to receive their support through propaganda and censorship, and through subtle, emotional communication to the educated faithful that their tribe must believe the consensus in question, on which their membership depends.
Party infighting proves that there is a prospect of power to fight for. So, though had to be stopped quickly, the recent conflict in Reform has shown how big a force they have become. Further, the inevitably difficult weeks of political life play a crucial rôle in giving leaders the chance to prove their calibre.
After Nigel Farage’s swift action, in removing Rupert Lowe, and returning immediately to focus on the country — the opposite of prolonged, self-indulgent Tory-infighting — Britain still wants Reform, as the new opinion poll, below, shows.
Screenshot
Today, a Daily Telegraph post tried, speculatively, to capitalise on Reform’s difficult week of Rupert Lowe’s dismissal. Its unthought clichés — ‘broken, infighting mess’ — were, respectively, untrue, obvious and vague.
The Tories — The Telegraph’s chosen political party for ages — have been full of infighting for ages, too. The confusion that resulted for their brand and their aim has now been replaced with the still worse problem that, along with Labour and the Lib Dems, their policies are controlled by the #WEF and the #UN: not by the voters. That is why ever fewer want the #ToryRulingClass to ‘take charge’, to quote the Telegraph headline’s unfortunate yet telling phrase today. If they did, it would just be dictatorship by the modern ruling class: the #LibLabCon #UniParty.
Screenshot
Instead, we want freedom, with low tax, and without the globalism of #NetZero, the UN, the EU and the WHO.
Unlike the Conservative Party over the course of many scandals, Reform handled their difficult week with decision and openess, putting the country first.
As a result, Reform are stronger than before, and so is their two way bond with their supporters, who can see that spin and denial — the toxic tools of the professional politician — have been ditched.
The revolution is now that much more real: and, as the #NetZeroTories fade, Britain wants Reform still more.
The popular idea of the psychopath is one who, devoid of empathy and of guilt, and so unconnected to the forces of any benign social contract, breaks the law to harm and kill.
This model does not describe the many doctors and ‘healthcare professionals’ who have refused to consider mounting evidence that confounds official claims that the vaccine is #SafeAndEffective, and whose initial trust in the system has been followed only by their turning a lasting blind eye to the vaccine damage that they have caused and encountered. For the harm that these people have inflicted has been done in the name of obedience: the same obedience that will have been the original foundation for their good manners in the street, when shopping, with colleagues and on social occasions.
That suggests that most, though not all, of apparently constructive citizens’ behaviour is driven by obedience and conformism — by the herd instinct — and not by genuinely considered moral judgements. So, when their boss tells them to believe, as in 1984, that five fingers are actually four fingers, they comply — and, as a group, ostracise the minority who speak the forbidden truth, thus, in the short term, helping to spread a silent hypnosis that advances corrupt authority’s cause.
This phenomenon of widespread susceptibility to group hypnosis is particularly sad because many of those afflicted are decent people, who will help a fellow when asked, and want to do good. But they do not have the strength to go against a prevailing movement or an official instruction, however grave the consequences, and however bad their subconscious feels about it.
Recently, this has resulted in rampant evil and mass killing, which continues: its executives unchecked, and its authors unconvicted.
Thoughts on the solution to 0 x 0, as declared to pertain over a given set, in certain conditions.
Definition of ‘nothingness’: the attribute which is being nothing; the being of nothing; the essence of nothing.
If a set is empty of nothing, then it can contain anything except nothing. In the event that there are, thus, zero lots of zero in that set, a condition must pertain which constitutes non-zeroness throughout that set.
Set-spanning non-zeroness is the result of multiplying zero, not by any non-zero number (which would create the absence of that non-zero number), but by zero, since ‘zero lots of zero’ means the ‘non-occurrence of zero’, which is any number, except zero; in other words, something, somewhere!
Considering the concept of 0 x 0 philosophically thus shows, simply, that the answer is not 0, which many wrongly assert.
If the multiplication is expanded to its additional nature, the same result is evident.
0 x n = 0 + 0 + … + 0 (n times)
For the case where n = 0, the answer is a list devoid of zeros: and therefore, also, a set which is empty of nothingness and, over the span of which, there must only be non-zero items.
So, 0 x 0 describes a situation which is empty of nothingness, and can, therefore, be anything except zero. The solution is therefore the complete set of possibilities, except zero.
Accordingly, 0 x 0 is not equal to 0, but may be anything else.
Britain has been deeply wronged and insulted: not by Trump — but by its own criminal establishment, and a series of criminal governments.
When the Daily Express calls for push-back against Trump, The Daily Express omits this crucial fact from its reckoning. The patriotic solution for all Britons is to remove their intentionally dishonest and abusive establishment, and to restore freedom, prosperity and happiness to their land.
In that endeavour, President Trump will be very great help, demonstrating, as he is, the same process across the Atlantic, and having, as he does, strong links to the leaders of Britain’s forthcoming revolution.
The media-warped misrepresentation of support for corrupt rulers as love of country is stale and failing — and continues only because Britain’s WEF executive pawns have no Plan B.
In response to Donald Trump’s decisive exposure of Zelensky and removal of funds for the Ukraine war’s fraud, The Telegraph now describes Trump as a businessman, not a ‘Commander in Chief’.
Columnist Hamish de Bretton-Gordon falls back on a cliché soundbite which bears no scrutiny: for the fault of self-interested business lies with NATO, with the #MilitaryIndustrialComplex, and with their callous, selfish and pathetic puppet, Zelensky. Trump’s removal of a free arms supply from this criminal enterprise — against a headwind of mainstream media hysteria, sponsored by the blood-soaked #DeepState — is an act of courage, wisdom and confidence, worthy indeed of any Commander in Chief, whose first rôle is, of course, to secure peace.
The Daily Telegraph might note that good business and wealth generation — like effective military leadership — begin with honesty; currently deployed by Trump to great effect, but sadly not by their own media outlets, nor by NATO, whose stained cause they espouse.
Trump’s honesty is only now counting for the world because he leads its most powerful country.
However, it is no coincidence that American society has generated such a leader: cultures in which freedom makes goodness legally optional, and therefore genuine when it occurs, make that same goodness stronger; and goodness is naturally constructive and marketable, which means that such cultures will inevitably be the strongest.
Following the path of God releases divine power: and, on a national scale, America has done this more than any other country.
A few weeks ago, #TruthExcites said that uncompromising antiglobalism and libertarianism was both the easiest path for Reform leader, Nigel Farage, and also his only route to victory — the latter since honesty is his unique selling point, which has poured members his way, at the expense of the #LibLabCon #UniParty.
The media’s promotion of the Ukraine war — led by the supposedly libertarian Telegraph’s romance with socialist Kier Starmer, conditional to his committing British troops to that doomed, unworthy cause — has left much of the public outraged, and rightly so: they have discovered, from the ongoing hoaxes of covid and man made global warming, that the establishment lies for a living.
Screenshot
So Nigel Farage’s post, shown above to the effect that Trump is ‘not the bully’, and that Zelensky’s ‘corruption will be exposed’, is going in the right direction — much more so than his original description of the Trump-Zelensky exchange as ‘regrettable’. But Farage needs to go further. He must highlight NATO’s steady encroachment on Russia’s hinterland, along with Western globalists’ orchestrated coup, a decade ago, which installed an anti-Russian President on Russia’s doorstep: moves that the no super-power would have tolerated, as shown by America’s response to the #CubanMissileCrisis.
The awakened public do not consent to NATO’s games, and they seek only a force which, like Trump, will not be a slave to the #MilitaryIndustrialComplex.
If Nigel Farage makes Reform that force, power will be his, for — when life is clearly at stake — principles win over conformism to a false, official consensus. But, if he fights shy of supporting Trump and Putin, and of exposing NATO’s full Ukraine fraud, he will be doomed to fade into the #UniParty, for — in that eventuality — Reform will not be reform.
With ten tin tanks, and a few, abused human beings, Kier Starmer has the arrogance to feign a British peacekeeping mission in Ukraine.
Screenshot
Since the longterm aggressor is NATO, the single, peace-ensuring act has actually been Trump’s removal of Zelensky’s funding for his shallow, murderous comedian’s promotion of this fraudulent war.
Far from solving a problem created by Trump, Kier Starmer is trying to perpetuate a problem solved by Trump. His new friend, the supposedly libertarian Daily Telegraph, is supporting him in this endeavour. Ultimately, both guilty parties will ensure only their own decline as — with massive popular awakening, and now US government opposition — the Globalist Cabal is very deeply cracked.
Writing in The Telegraph, Tom Harris suggests that socialist Starmer could save his failing leadership — as long as he starts a war with Russia.
Thus a journalist, in a Britain’s main free-market broadsheet, backs a destructive, WEF-controlled, socialist British PM, on condition he use the cliché and bloody escape-route of failed dictators everywhere: starting a war.
The Trump-phobic, BlackRock-compliant Telegraph continues to sink, and — as comments on Facebook show — its slow suicide is not going unnoticed.
Real events transmit real waves: fake events don't. So, only truth excites !!! #DrinkFromTheStream !!!
truthexcites 