Is Justin Trudeau’s official, shabby bribery of independent Canadian media a timely wake up call to free thought and expression — and financially ill-conceived from his viewpoint?

He has launched a scheme offering extra funding to media organisations which mould their operation to gain his approval.


This comes just as the #TechLeft’s Silicon Valley, located in the communicatively free US Body Politic of the First Amendment, has created a Cyber Politic realm where its censorship applies, and which has — over the past decade — become the main debate arena.

This Cyber Politic extends around the world. A digital media platform has become an international country, with laws that wield more society-shaping power than the US government — and which wants to use them to impose its values on the public.

Moves like Trudeau’s are helping this distortion of world consciousness — and beginning to effect politics significantly, as Globalist Macron’s election in France over Marine Le Pen, and Facebook’s silencing of conservatives and Infowars, pre-midterms, showed.

But people are starting to realise what is happening.


By sponsoring those who will sell him their journalistic independence, Trudeau reduces the credibility — and thus the monetary value — of the media companies who accept his #GlobalistShilling.

With stark clarity, this attempted bribery will show the awakening public, by default, who they can trust.

To help create a #LightWeb of worldwide #FirstAmendmentFreedom, from cables and servers to searches, payment systems and content, please call TruthExcites.com on 0044 7881 954 810.


UK reality star, Luisa Zissman, declared on a radio talk show that there shouldn’t have been a British EU membership referendum — since governments are chosen to take big decisions for the people.

TruthExcites.com argues that this contrived, defeatist deference to opaque globalist power is a general millennial trait — and, psychologically, a very unusual one for a youth movement.

Examining Luisa’s assertion, it should be noted that governments are chosen according to which policies they promise — meaning the democratic system is designed PRECISELY for public decision making.

Further, when then-PM David Cameron called the British EU referendum, it was a public vote, amid a uniformly pro-EU establishment. It was, thus, direct democracy in a situation where only a specific in-or-out vote could give the option of EU exit.

If you read the feature on Luisa’s statement, linked beneath this article, how does her tone strike you?

For me, behind the contrived argument that EU membership’s pros and cons are beyond people’s grasp, lies a querulous denial of human potential — and of her own.

The notions of a public’s proudly, dutifully surrendering big calls to leaders, and of governments’ license to withhold votes when they oppose public will, are anti-human and defeatist — in a way typical of some millennial movements whose surrendering of self-belief has been a condition subtly imposed on them, by a post-Rock’n’Roll education, as a requirement for zeitgeist membership — and for ensuing social and professional opportunities.

Opinions ventured in support of this entrenched, politically correct hyper-modesty, ring strangely: is it their lack of reason which seems to give them a defensive, almost-tearful intensity?

Are they driven by want for a mission? Has problem-free Western prosperity left millennials without a project to establish their generational identity, or their belonging as individuals within that generation?

Thence could arise the need for an ill-defined yet all-pervasive richteousness, credited them by a self-styled trendy authority — in exchange for taking their decisions! It is an authority licensed by MTV and the pseudo-liberating, calculated glamour of globalist media, who make thought-diktat palatable by having its acceptance a necessary license for a mind-drugging form of hedonism, the obligation of which kills true eroticism — along with the mind.

This subconsciously established contract supports universities’ thought-fossilising snowflakism, as an army of lecturers and faux-progressive mentors attack individualism to sell oppression — by virtue merely of its contempt for the supposed sepia-primitivism of a semi-mythical old order.

Appearing to subvert parental education, the mentor-class remove the inner belief which that very thing instils: they are, indeed, the #BigBrothers of globalist authority, which erodes the family to steal the soul.

Millenial ego’s need to own the views, which — subconsciously — they know have been projected onto them, makes them cling to snowflakism more tightly. Theirs is the praise, and the cool — and the loss of mental independence, self-confidence and any true capacity to act.

Without realising it, they have made themselves an obedient, orthodox congregation, in a twisted church whose only — and squalid — aim is to gather power for its managers by hiding thought’s light.

The end result is a fear of the self — lest its still, small voice collapse the false euphoria of deference to the group-feed. It manifests as a strange, illiberal modesty: a politically correct self-effacement, like a modern version of Victorian etiquette, whose mantra of cool belonging is that ‘authority knows best’.

Such entrapped pessimism dripped miserably from Luisa Zissman’s needy assumption that ‘no deal’ would naturally PUNISH leave voters — instead of being their STAIRWAY TO FREEDOM, and away from the toxic weight of #StayMay’s lead anchor.

No wonder former ‘Sex Pistols’ punk revolutionary, Johnny Rotten, is a Brexiteer.


!!! #LightWeb !!!


In 2016, vox populi surfed social media’s currents, sharing uncensored thought with enlightening multiplicity.

It powered Trump’s win.

That anti-establishment tremor triggered #BigTech’s skewing of the web against newly oxygenated libertarianism. And, sure enough, Marion Le Pen then lost to Globalist Macron in France, where — as before the 2018 midterms — Twitter and Facebook purged thousands of conservative pages, and notably those of large alternative providers, like Infowars (whose brand reached the UK mainstream media as a result of the dispute).

People talk of the criminal dark web’s danger, as the black market’s unlicensed online home. But, for political debate, the presence of regulation, not its absence, causes problems through the trammeling of bloggers’ enlightening currents.

So, do we need a #LightWeb?

This would be uncensored, and thus with full, First Amendment freedom.

It would require those who prize free speech to set up tech companies to cover every stage of internet communication, from long distance cable and server provision, to software platforms, search engines and payment systems, so that conservative websites, social networks and individuals would not be vulnerable to legal no-platforming by Leftist tech companies with snowflake agendas. Given the Left’s near-monopoly in Silicon Valley, a potential grouping of tech-libertarian service providers would have a huge and growing market, just as nineties FOX NEWS did, when they breathed life into the Leftist cable news sector.

A libertarian set of web infrastructure companies would safeguard the Right’s voice online, whilst leaving the Left’s voice justly intact — and letting the logic of multiple human minds be the perfect judge, without the falseness of any government-imposed net neutrality: a meaningless concept, given, in a universe of innumerable ideas, the non-existence of a thought median, about which to be balanced on any given subject.


Just as the free market has boosted economic liquidity, through liberty’s creativity, so free speech — and now social networking — have accelerated information exchange, personal evaluation and distillation of Jung’s collective conscious.

Million-fold verification is cognitive karma, since, if data and discourse are relayed through a series of independent minds, falsehood atrophies and truth forms a viral crystal.

This process is multiple, organic and peer based, needing neither judge nor censor. Accelerated by autonomy, the internet’s recent advances in society’s data-current density have highlighted wealth’s communication base.

The notion of prosperity becomes a matter of attunement: to physical surroundings, via a healthy diet and respiration; and also to conscious surroundings — to other people. In the resulting harmony, the psycho-physics of perception, wisdom and communication optimise energy flow, understanding and our universe.

One of America’s many great virtues is its conversation’s directness which — aside from current snowflake susceptibility to politicised thought-alignment — avoids concept-loss through appeasement, qualification and false compromise, that afflicts mainstream British debate.


Simple truth keeps viral resonance.

In 2020, it will need it.

In order to continue, the #MAGA revolution must spread from Trump’s worldly wise 2016 voters, to the college-educated youth vote, ensuring that the maturing of university millennials onto voter registers effects his base positively.


An open web — the world’s university — and America’s myth-busting open eyes, make such a leap very possible, even inevitable.

Trump’s calculatedly brash 2016 approach, siphoning free advertising from Leftist mainstream media outrage, leaves intact the universal principles of his wisdom, and their easy, pithy communication amongst webwise free spirits — as long as there are platforms which host them, fairly.

A constitution-loving MAGA coalition, for 2020 and beyond, might well fuse the robust, American dream with its 21st Century ‘hipster’ corollary of Aquarianism: a spiritually questing belief in the individual’s ascension, and in their developmental and giving capacity, from the absorbed, enriching value of personal life path: not from one dictated by an external authority source.

!!! TruthExcites.com !!!

How can we make this happen?

Can we actually use the principal that only truth’s resonance multiplies — so a totally unregulated platform will become an enlightened crystal: the #LightWeb?

This article is a call to action.

It is a call to make thought both liberation and tool, powering currents of intelligent consciousness against doomed political oppression, and releasing the logic of creation: the planet’s capacity to understand, as an internally interconnected Tesla brain.

Truth excites: authenticity has an enquiry-stimulating resonance, which draws in the listener — just as data-bearing light ‘excites’ an electron, making it vibrate.

TruthExcites.com is now a blog. As Silicon Valley censors social media, can it become a replacement social network?

On it, speech would be absolutely unfettered, and people — as with democracies — would be the thinkers and the judges. This would also make it naturally, universally popular.

Let’s wire consciousness free.

If you would like to help, please call us on 0044 7881 954 810


Gravity’s existence makes masses collect — allowing the retention of sufficiently locally dense matter for a multiplicity of permutations to trigger life, which can then reach out.

Does that mean that heterogeneous energy density supports consciousness, which, once born from versatile, option-rich local bond density, then fills in the cosmic gaps?

Is that where we are now?

!!! WHET RAG !!!

Reverse-reflected in new Leftwing owner, #TrinityMirror, Express leader-article PRAISES HAMMOND’S BLOATED BUDGET — and his ‘SKILFUL’ SOFT-BREXIT SHAM, whose low deceit was undone by his compulsive contempt for the country, shown in the patronising 50p commemoration that he proposed for the sterling land of the world-shaping pound.