The essence of freedom is active, self-sufficient people and small government.

Trump’s tariffs could be seen as the opposite: as government’s choking free trade.

However, the tariffs on imports to America actually impede only the corporations and forces that are aligned with BlackRock; and that want to work with the central banking cartel to control puppet governments, and thence populations.

Trumps tariffs don’t attack free trade: they attack world government, and — in the process — they free the trade of the real economy: liberating domestic manufacturing that was intentionally destroyed decades ago, creating the Rust Belt’s designer urban decay, and with it greater public dependency on government — as described in detail in David Webb’s book, TheGreatTaking.com.

Trump’s protectionism thus advances protection against a corporate World Government monopoly, and allows trade to flourish without the market manipulation of such a cartel. Trump’s twin policies of economic nationalism, and cuts to domestic government and taxes, are thus parallel in advancing individual freedom — against world government and domestic government, respectively.

Under the #WorldEconomicForum’s leadership — and with Kemi Badenoch as their spokeswoman — the Tories are wetter than ever.

This is because charisma comes from true adherence to a principal which resonates, palpably, from every utterence: the substance of the brand.

In following international globalism — with only a few more professed doubts than Labour — the Tories real identity is a facilitator of the UN agenda. So, when they claim otherwise, it rings false.

That is why they are boring. And that is why they are now so desperate that their ads against ReformUK — about rats and re-aligned grannies — have gone from weak to bizarre.

Without the scaffolding of principal, the Conservatives are collapsing.

ReformUK’s consistent identity of direction, and spontaniety of integrity, is the power behind its rise.

#BritainWantsReform

Those who modify their opinions for others’ approval do so because, subconsciously, they think that is the best they can do: they don’t believe they have the power to make their own way work, in a way that would override any short term pain of conflict.

Virtue signalling, therefore, is hopeless.

The popular idea of the psychopath is one who, devoid of empathy and of guilt, and so unconnected to the forces of any benign social contract, breaks the law to harm and kill.

This model does not describe the many doctors and ‘healthcare professionals’ who have refused to consider mounting evidence that confounds official claims that the vaccine is #SafeAndEffective, and whose initial trust in the system has been followed only by their turning a lasting blind eye to the vaccine damage that they have caused and encountered. For the harm that these people have inflicted has been done in the name of obedience: the same obedience that will have been the original foundation for their good manners in the street, when shopping, with colleagues and on social occasions.

That suggests that most, though not all, of apparently constructive citizens’ behaviour is driven by obedience and conformism — by the herd instinct — and not by genuinely considered moral judgements. So, when their boss tells them to believe, as in 1984, that five fingers are actually four fingers, they comply — and, as a group, ostracise the minority who speak the forbidden truth, thus, in the short term, helping to spread a silent hypnosis that advances corrupt authority’s cause. 

This phenomenon of widespread susceptibility to group hypnosis is particularly sad because many of those afflicted are decent people, who will help a fellow when asked, and want to do good. But they do not have the strength to go against a prevailing movement or an official instruction, however grave the consequences, and however bad their subconscious feels about it.

Recently, this has resulted in rampant evil and mass killing, which continues: its executives unchecked, and its authors unconvicted.

Thoughts on the solution to 0 x 0, as declared to pertain over a given set, in certain conditions.

Definition of ‘nothingness’: the attribute which is being nothing; the being of nothing; the essence of nothing.

If a set is empty of nothing, then it can contain anything except nothing. In the event that there are, thus, zero lots of zero in that set, a condition must pertain which constitutes non-zeroness throughout that set.

Set-spanning non-zeroness is the result of multiplying zero, not by any non-zero number (which would create the absence of that non-zero number), but by zero, since ‘zero lots of zero’ means the ‘non-occurrence of zero’, which is any number, except zero; in other words, something, somewhere!

Considering the concept of 0 x 0 philosophically thus shows, simply, that the answer is not 0, which many wrongly assert.

If the multiplication is expanded to its additional nature, the same result is evident.

0 x n = 0 + 0 + … + 0 (n times)

For the case where n = 0, the answer is a list devoid of zeros: and therefore, also, a set which is empty of nothingness and, over the span of which, there must only be non-zero items.

So, 0 x 0 describes a situation which is empty of nothingness, and can, therefore, be anything except zero. The solution is therefore the complete set of possibilities, except zero.

Accordingly, 0 x 0 is not equal to 0, but may be anything else.