Britain has been deeply wronged and insulted: not by Trump — but by its own criminal establishment, and a series of criminal governments.

When the Daily Express calls for push-back against Trump, The Daily Express omits this crucial fact from its reckoning. The patriotic solution for all Britons is to remove their intentionally dishonest and abusive establishment, and to restore freedom, prosperity and happiness to their land.

In that endeavour, President Trump will be very great help, demonstrating, as he is, the same process across the Atlantic, and having, as he does, strong links to the leaders of Britain’s forthcoming revolution.

The media-warped misrepresentation of support for corrupt rulers as love of country is stale and failing — and continues only because Britain’s WEF executive pawns have no Plan B.

#ShareTruth !!! #UnleashMassNonCompliance !!! #SayNoTogether

In response to Donald Trump’s decisive exposure of Zelensky and removal of funds for the Ukraine war’s fraud, The Telegraph now describes Trump as a businessman, not a ‘Commander in Chief’.

Columnist Hamish de Bretton-Gordon falls back on a cliché soundbite which bears no scrutiny: for the fault of self-interested business lies with NATO, with the #MilitaryIndustrialComplex, and with their callous, selfish and pathetic puppet, Zelensky. Trump’s removal of a free arms supply from this criminal enterprise — against a headwind of mainstream media hysteria, sponsored by the blood-soaked #DeepState — is an act of courage, wisdom and confidence, worthy indeed of any Commander in Chief, whose first rôle is, of course, to secure peace.

The Daily Telegraph might note that good business and wealth generation — like effective military leadership — begin with honesty; currently deployed by Trump to great effect, but sadly not by their own media outlets, nor by NATO, whose stained cause they espouse.

Trump’s honesty is only now counting for the world because he leads its most powerful country.

However, it is no coincidence that American society has generated such a leader: cultures in which freedom makes goodness legally optional, and therefore genuine when it occurs, make that same goodness stronger; and goodness is naturally constructive and marketable, which means that such cultures will inevitably be the strongest.

Following the path of God releases divine power: and, on a national scale, America has done this more than any other country.

A few weeks ago, #TruthExcites said that uncompromising antiglobalism and libertarianism was both the easiest path for Reform leader, Nigel Farage, and also his only route to victory — the latter since honesty is his unique selling point, which has poured members his way, at the expense of the #LibLabCon #UniParty.

The media’s promotion of the Ukraine war — led by the supposedly libertarian Telegraph’s romance with socialist Kier Starmer, conditional to his committing British troops to that doomed, unworthy cause — has left much of the public outraged, and rightly so: they have discovered, from the ongoing hoaxes of covid and man made global warming, that the establishment lies for a living.

So Nigel Farage’s post, shown above to the effect that Trump is ‘not the bully’, and that Zelensky’s ‘corruption will be exposed’, is going in the right direction — much more so than his original description of the Trump-Zelensky exchange as ‘regrettable’. But Farage needs to go further. He must highlight NATO’s steady encroachment on Russia’s hinterland, along with Western globalists’ orchestrated coup, a decade ago, which installed an anti-Russian President on Russia’s doorstep: moves that the no super-power would have tolerated, as shown by America’s response to the #CubanMissileCrisis.

The awakened public do not consent to NATO’s games, and they seek only a force which, like Trump, will not be a slave to the #MilitaryIndustrialComplex.

If Nigel Farage makes Reform that force, power will be his, for — when life is clearly at stake — principles win over conformism to a false, official consensus. But, if he fights shy of supporting Trump and Putin, and of exposing NATO’s full Ukraine fraud, he will be doomed to fade into the #UniParty, for — in that eventuality — Reform will not be reform.

The choice is Nigel’s.

With ten tin tanks, and a few, abused human beings, Kier Starmer has the arrogance to feign a British peacekeeping mission in Ukraine.

Since the longterm aggressor is NATO, the single, peace-ensuring act has actually been Trump’s removal of Zelensky’s funding for his shallow, murderous comedian’s promotion of this fraudulent war.

Far from solving a problem created by Trump, Kier Starmer is trying to perpetuate a problem solved by Trump. His new friend, the supposedly libertarian Daily Telegraph, is supporting him in this endeavour. Ultimately, both guilty parties will ensure only their own decline as — with massive popular awakening, and now US government opposition — the Globalist Cabal is very deeply cracked.

#ShareTruth !!! #UnleashMassNonCompliance !!! #SayNoTogether !!! #TakeFreedom

Writing in The Telegraph, Tom Harris suggests that socialist Starmer could save his failing leadership — as long as he starts a war with Russia.

Thus a journalist, in a Britain’s main free-market broadsheet, backs a destructive, WEF-controlled, socialist British PM, on condition he use the cliché and bloody escape-route of failed dictators everywhere: starting a war.

The Trump-phobic, BlackRock-compliant Telegraph continues to sink, and — as comments on Facebook show — its slow suicide is not going unnoticed.

Zelensky is a heavily sponsored performer and comedian, carefully branded as a trendy, pioneering ‘liberal, People’s General’. He is held in his position only by the apparatus of the proxy war, and by his rôle as the front for its being continued, supported by mainstream media, including #NeoCon outlets, like The Telegraph.

He has no ability to manage a country, still less negotiate. That is why he will do anything that he is told to continue the war: in his own interest, it is what he must do, and — as a puppet, not politician — it’s all he can do.

When the war is finished, so is Zelensky.

For the duration if NATO’s Ukraine performance, Zelensky has played the rôle of the lovable hero, with the precious gift for the comic touch.

All he had to do was receive the plaudits of his puppeteers and their audience, with his fake air of mischievous modesty — thus apparently defusing the crisis, in his capacity as a great leader — and pepetuate NATO’s offensive with his fake stoicism; all the while enjoying the life of luxury with which his collaboration was rewarded.

But now Trump is here: critical and challenging, and — for the first time — Zelensky has to respond, in public, to something other than the plaudits of the globalists and their media outlets. The performer, who cares for nothing except himself, and who has only practised modest smiles, has to deal with open criticism. For this, he has no button. Moreover, because he has the emotional disinterest in his country of the rented comic puppet that he is, he doesn’t even have the capacity to be genuinely forceful or constructively angry.

He is empty and — wrong footed by the sudden appearance of Trump’s truth — his poise and rhetoric are cringeworthily and deservedly lost.

Britain’s small-c conservatives care more about conformism and subservience to self-effacing supposed tradition, than they do about low tax, freedom and long term investment in one’s country via the business liberation, and the energy independence, of ditching the #ClimateCO2N’s #NetZeroCult.

As it flatters these, its more gullible readers, is The Telegraph losing its principles?

In reporting gossip, supposedly about Elon Musk’s lovechild, it refers to the alleged mother as a ‘Right-wing writer’. The tone echoes the Left-wing media’s disapproving use of the term. Further, by mentioning her being ‘Right-wing’ at all, The Telegraph, by implication, suggests that it is not.

Perhaps, now that the Left-Right spectrum is clearly defined, mathematically, as the spectrum from big government dictatorship to small government freedom, The Telegraph should ask itself what its politics really are: whether they are based on unquestioned convention and authority, or on freedom and prosperity.

If it does this, then it can tell its readers.